Electronic Signatures Electronic signatures on PDF attachments within your application are not allowed. Documents with signatures e. Filenames Save all document attachments with descriptive filenames of 50 characters or less including spaces.
Applicants should clearly state that they have the appropriate resources to conduct the research, such as adequate equipment and laboratory space. When possible, include letters of commitment for these resources.
Understand the level of resources needed to compete. Conduct an organizational assessment.
Consider whether the available equipment and facilities are adequate and whether the environment is conducive to the research. Independence and Institutional Support: This is important for all investigators, but particularly for new and early stage investigators or those who are early in their independent careers: Provide reviewers evidence that you have the appropriate experience and training to lead and manage the research project.
Letters of reference and institutional commitment are important. Mention any start-up funds, support for a technician, etc. This is a positive indicator of institutional commitment to the peer reviewers.
Determine the expertise needed for your research study team individuals, collaborating organizations, resources, etc. Most scientific work requires collaboration among researchers, and NIH is dedicated to fostering such relationships.
Include letters of commitment in your application that clearly spell out the roles of the collaborators. The grant application should contain a signed letter from each collaborator to the applicant that lists the contribution he or she intends to make and his or her commitment to the work.
These letters are often the primary assurance the reviewers have that this work will in fact be done. If you are planning to apply with multiple-principal investigatorsthen take the following into consideration: The format, peer review and administration of applications submitted with multiple PIs do have some significant differences from the traditional single-PI application.
Therefore, it is essential to consider all aspects of the funding mechanism before applying, regardless of the type of research proposal to be submitted.
All applicants proposing team science efforts are strongly encouraged to contact their NIH program officials at the earliest possible date to discuss the appropriateness submitting with multiple-PIs for the support of their research.
Reviewers with expertise in your area will best recognize the potential for your research to advance science. Review the rosters of the scientific review groups to get your application assigned to a study section where some members have the appropriate expertise to review your project.
Specify your assignment request in a cover letter or in the assignment request form included in your application. Follow the application guide instructions as to what you may and may not request, and what information should go in the cover letter vs the assignment request form.
Only NIH staff with a need to know are provided access to your assignment request and cover letter.
Reviewers to not access to them. This is an opportunity to also provide names of any reviewers that may have a conflict of interest and should not be considered as reviewers of your application. It is important to match your area of research with the areas reviewed by the study section.
Determine whether you qualify as a new investigator based on the NIH definition of new investigator. NIH staff is on the lookout for new and early stage investigators.
Check your eRA Commons account and ensure your funding history and the date of your residency or terminal degree are accurate to ensure that you are identified appropriately as a new or early stage investigator.
It is to your advantage to identify yourself as a new investigator because reviewers are instructed to give special consideration to new investigators.
Reviewers will give greater consideration to the proposed approach, rather than the track record. First-time applicants may have less preliminary data and fewer publications than more seasoned investigators, and NIH reviewers understand this.
Reviewers instead place more emphasis on how the investigator has demonstrated that he or she is truly independent of any former mentors, whether he or she has some of his or her own resources and institutional support, and whether he or she is able to independently lead the research.
Foreign applicants can learn more at our Information for Foreign Applicants and Grantees page. This step will be one of your most time-consuming in the writing process.
Know what type of budget will be required to submit with your application found in your FOA. Contact NIH program officials regarding allowability and other budgetary questions. For more information, see Develop Your Budget.
Your Research Plan The research plan describes the proposed research, stating its significance and how it will be conducted. Remember, your application has two audiences: All reviewers are important to you because each reviewer gets one vote.Updated November 9, We set fiscal year R01 paylines and interim paylines for all other grant types shown except for Ks.
Paylines are the funding cutoff points for grant applications. Apr 30, · NIH applicants have the opportunity to suggest information to help NIH refer and review their grant application.
When applying with the new FORMS-D application package, applicants will include their requests in the new assignment request form, rather than in the cover letter has has been done in the past.
May 16, · Do not include headers or footers in your attachments. We will add headers, footers, page numbers, bookmarks and a table of contents when we assemble your grant application .
Some useful samples and examples that are part of the grant application from NIAID and NIH, including sample applications and summaries, data sharing, and model organism sharing plans.
NIH strongly recommends that you include a cover letter with your application indicating the specific NIH Institute or Center (IC) that you believe should have primary assignment of your application, and which review committee would be most appropriate to review the application. The Center for.
CENDI is an interagency cooperative organization composed of the scientific and technical information (STI) managers from the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, Education, Defense, the Environmental Protection Agency, Health and Human Services, Interior, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Government Printing Office, the National Archives and Records.